Jump to content

[4.2.0 experimental - tactical] adjacent cover calculation is still bugged


Skitso

Recommended Posts

If I understood the rules correctly, any cover that is adjacent to the attacker should not be counted. Also, any cover with same or smaller cover value that is connected to the first cover should also not be counted. It's not the case:  

image.jpeg.92444348eb36fcfa558fbec18ec4dcac.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/1/2024 at 10:14 AM, Skitso said:

If I understood the rules correctly, any cover that is adjacent to the attacker should not be counted. Also, any cover with same or smaller cover value that is connected to the first cover should also not be counted. It's not the case:  

image.jpeg.92444348eb36fcfa558fbec18ec4dcac.jpeg

There's one exception to the rule - the final piece of cover is not discounted if it's adjacent cover for the unit being targeted. Otherwise you end up in some strange situations with long lines of cover.

If the Mantid was stood one tile further back then both hay bales would be ignored.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chris said:

There's one exception to the rule - the final piece of cover is not discounted if it's adjacent cover for the unit being targeted. Otherwise you end up in some strange situations with long lines of cover.

If the Mantid was stood one tile further back then both hay bales would be ignored.

Makes sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...