Gijs-Jan

@Skitso To be honest, I'd refrain from blaming anything on your end before I really start on the optimizations! And when I do and you still have issue, and you have the time, we can probably take a look at what specifically it is on your machine that might be bottlenecking it. :-)

It's definitely planned. Hmm, interesting. I wouldn't expect such a hard drop-off, especially with your hardware (I've got a 1070 here as well). And you're right in that the Simple to Fast is the point where all dynamic lights get shut off. Suspect it's the shadow handling then, which is also tied to the lightmaps. Earlier you mentioned that there wasn't any AA btw; the whole reason we're still using forward rendering at the moment is for AA, and it should be enabled upper tiers.

Yeah, this is definitely due to the lighting setup in that case (per pixel lights is too high on the Fantastic setting). It won't be an issue in the main game. It should be fixed once we sort out the lightmap issues, or alternatively something more drastic to fix it. (There are issues with the lightmapping in the rendering path we're using in Unity, which was used because it supports hardware AA) The transparancy effect is a side effect of how Unity deals with it, and we'll probably need to write a different shader for it.

The FPS drops I've not seen on similar hardware. Have you been able to tie it to specific cases? (Units walking, or shooting destructible terrain, etc) As for the performance: There are a tonne of optimizations we've simply disabled because they just consume development time while things are up in the air. There are "minor" ones such as logging and debug code that cause most of the "stutter" currently in game. There are "major" ones such as mesh merging, lightmapping (for those knowledgeable, a bit more problematic in our setup) and optimizations on the materials, or even rewriting shaders such that they're not just plug-and-play shaders. The mesh merging alone, although mostly benefiting lower-end hardware, bumped FPS about 3x-5x (from 60ish to 300ish). And then there are the cases where some code is still doing way more than it should be doing, because we're experimenting with certain mechanics. You can expect a lot of improvement in speed as we continue development the coming few months because a lot we haven't been able to do as we were still changing, well, almost everything. I'll bring up performance in the morning meeting tomorrow and see if we might be able to put out a comparison build now that the pressure of the Kickstarter is partially behind us.

What can I say; it's the Ayy Lmao bit that sealed it for me. If I ever get the time, I'll try to update this thread :-)

I think I properly understood it then; and it's still a bit of the same issue. Design-wise one of the things we're considering is putting an emphasize on the strength of individual aliens. That would mean we'd have only a couple of aliens on the battlescape, the opposite from having dozens of aliens on the battlescape. Having said all of that, I've still noted it down. Maybe an idea would be to have the Androns fill this role in a terminator-esque horror-scenario. The planned swarm-based alien could exist in support roles to the larger individual (normal strength) Andron units.

Yeah, I like the sound of that. After the release pressure on the Kickstarter and the closed Beta I might look into this in my spare time. I do think it'll be generally straight forward to mod into the game if we don't include it ourselves. I would imagine that balancing it in terms of how the aliens would feel could be an issue. As in, I don't think that most aliens work well for large-scale battles. The idea being that aliens are rather exclusive / in the background. Fighting a host of mind-controlled soldiers backed up by an alien might not be interesting enough.

It was set at a random range around the point of impact, and we're changing it up to be based on the distance of the throw.

We've patched quite some issues today and yesterday, I suspect Chris will put out a hotfix build before the next full release. :-) Thanks for all the bug reports!

Sorry, I meant crash reporting! (But the log does help).

Yeah, the development build is bound to run a lot slower sadly. However, there are some performance fixes we can still do; I'll look into it. > I tried to aim the grenade, then I switched to other solders. When I switch back he's still in grenade mode and clicking on rifle does not switch it back. Switching weapon, however, can switch him back to pistol and rifle, so it's a workaround. Noted and fixed! > I haven't tried to reload but I don't see any clip in the reload panel. Noted and we'll look into it. > Crashed in second turn on enemy overwatch, so haven't got much else to report for now. We're having a hard time reproducing this one. Is logging enabled for you?

*gulp*

Quite a bit slipped through in this release. But luckily most bugs reported were easily fixed: @Sheepy Hit chance is weird. I can make 2% burst that all hits. Actual hit rate feel like 95%. Some bullets hit obstacles but still damage the target. Fixed! Small SNAFU where the target getting damage was always the original target. Because it is too fast, I am not sure but I think the first five bullets deal 8 damage and the last five deal 11. Same with two shotgun shots, all hits in first volley deal one damage and second volley another. How is armor degradation applied? Degradation is applied per bullet. Sniper rifle reload cost 1 TU. Fixed! Haven't accidentally destroyed any cover or UFO object even when I expect to. May be related with all hits. Fixed, see the first fix! :-) I get no overwatch after enemy movements and reaper attack, and the aliens didn't make any overwatch either (auto-resolve off). Fixed! I can't find the gameplay log. Has it been moved? It should be in "My Documents\My Games\Xenonauts 2\Logs" Edit: almost forget the usual feature requests! Free camera? This is an option settable in Options in the next build. Jackal armour can be hard to spot when next to some rocks, may be a standby animation will help. Up and coming in a future release Can we show enemy facing in their ground indicator? I find myself reading a drone for a few cycles to make sure where he is facing. Noted down, and personally I agree! @Pave This is probably tied with the fact that the original target would always get damage, so it should be fixed. @Larry Burstyn Yes, the resisted message is for the damage not applying any damage. It's a bit confusing as the Stun Baton never deals direct damage, so I'm removing the popup for that case! Fixed in hotfix build!

This should be fixed in 0.6.0 (the build released today). As for the crashes, would you mind sharing which CPU & GPU you've got? We don't get any identifiable information in the bug reports, but I would be able to narrow it down a bit. Most crash reports we get, do get fixed in the build following them. (So within 2-4 weeks tops)

Yeah, I was a fan of this approach as well. If not for the fact that the implementation of it is also far easier to get right!