Jump to content

raziel1981

Members
  • Posts

    389
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by raziel1981

  1. here's a few thoughts I have regarding sci-fi DLC

    1) bipedal mechs as vehicles in ground combat (yeah i'm ripping this off from the assets directory but if it isn't meant for final development anyway, why not make a mod / dlc for it)?

    2) Exoskeletons for ground soldiers.

    3) Nanotechnology - can come in many ways by wearing a special suit, contributing to attributes (*cough* crysis *cough*). Or as pills/medicine that soldiers can take in combat. Much like a medikit, with nanobots augmenting their abilities.

    Or perhaps as a weapon like a dart gun that on impact injects its target (mechanical or organic) with nanites that wreck havoc on their target.

  2. 1) there's also alien base attacks, terror missions (in human cities of course) and Xenonauts base attack. There's also of course the final mission. I believe there should also be a "reclaiming fallen country" mission but i didn't play far enough to run into that.

    2) That's a known issue, one would to deal with it is using the scout car/hunter as it has a much bigger site then soldiers or using sight squad smartly.

    regarding your ps - it actually makes perfect sense cause the one behind the guy that's ducking won't shoot right into his friend unless he's a complete idiot...

  3. Loved the idea of the flamethrower and the mortar both sounds like tons fun. However splitting anything into a 2 men crew might require significant changes to the code so i dont think that would be feasible and if you do manage to get it done it would be great if you will tell others how you got it done so it would pave the way for other 2 men weapons (gatling/.50 cal anti material rifle to name a few)

  4. I certainly would prefer not to have to be restarting the game while developing air combat skills. If I mismanage my resources, or become impatient in ground combat that's one thing. A learning curve for air combat with a hefty and inevitable penalty for failure is another entirely.

    People are talking about dumbing down the game, but however much some people may like the air combat as it currently stands, I doubt very much that "difficult air combat with significant consequences for failure" is a major selling point for the majority of X-Com veterans.

    Sable Wyvren- indeed, while originally the air combat wasn't a selling major point of the original game, this is actually something that Xenonauts got so much better! This is a big part of the reason why i am very much against the indestructible planes thing, cause it would take a very fun aspect of the game (as is) and turn it into a joke.

  5. Lightzy - thats so convinient for you as the general direction that Chris is talking about aligns just with how you want things regarding this issue. I'll remember that in the future when perhaps a change to the game might pop up that you won't like and this time, the team's idea will be different from yours.

  6. Chris, it feels like the central strategy to dealing with more and more bugs recently has become "lets make unlimited this or unlimited that" in the name of one simplification or other. I honestly don't think that this is the right kind of approach to deal with the various technical problems that have risen in the last few weeks.

    I have the utmost respect for your team and this project, but some of the recent designing choices seem like someone had a serious OD of "F*#kitall". I understand that you guys are under a great deal of pressure due to the game going live on steam, but this shouldn't come at the cost of having (what I believe to be) the OGs spirit getting snuffed out like that. Especially, since the OG is the main reason most of us supported this project in the first place.

×
×
  • Create New...