Jump to content


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Dagar last won the day on November 15 2019

Dagar had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

51 Excellent

1 Follower

About Dagar

  • Rank
  1. Yeah, this is known, but not really published somewhere afaik.
  2. Dagar

    Your Xenonauts 2 wishlist?

    Whatever soulful means. FiraXCOM has its fair share of problems, which were not all adressed form FiraXCOM2, like not being able to lean out from a slightly elevated position (a step up, so to say) or cover destruction being basically the only meaningful tactic in the highest difficulty and Long War, because dashing into the unknown for a flanking manoeuvre leads to coffins full of Assault soldiers. I found FiraXCOMs systems enjoyable at first (it was my entry into the genre after all), but it gets very formulaic fast. In your defense, so does Xenonauts' system. I would call neither "soulful".
  3. Dagar

    Modular Armour System

    Talking about a back slot: If you can opt to not take a backpack, that should also be viable. What always bugged me that it made no sense to not stuff your soldiers to the brim of their carrying capability, i.e. in X1 there is a malus for carrying too much but no bonus for carrying less. Stalker had this as a very neat system of increasing encumbrance, which means you could opt to go in very quiet, fast and light or as a heavy, slow walking ammo and gun locker. Using a similar system it could be really viable to do light pistol scouts with increased TU (so they can move farther and use more items and stuff) and reflexes (so they don't get shot at as much. Extra cool would be if you could drop your backpack to get these bonuses temporarily. On the other end you might have heavy soldiers who cannot even do certain things, akin to how (at least in X-Division) the Predator wearers cannot use medkits. As another suggestion on equipment, how about a backpack that provides a smoke screen when (while) being shot at?
  4. Dagar

    Modular Armour System

    Sounds really good, I like the approach. I could envision both upgrades for all the gear of type X you currently have, if there is a flat-out improvement, e.g. +5 acc for the tactical visor from dissection of Ceasan sniper eyes, but also an alternative piece of gear with other stats (e.g. a heavier visor that has night vision or can see through smoke better, but does not have the acc bonus), which you would have to produce separately. Now how cool would it be if there were not actually new types of armour, but you'd elect a set of new components to be made into a new standard piece of armour? Like say the heavy armour, tactical visor and exoskeleton legs would become a new type of armour you can produce as an alternative to the single components, granting larger bonuses while unaltered (because they are designed as a whole instead of piecemeal) and also cost slightly less material compared to the single components. That would make the set of equipment a quasi-standard for your troops, i.e. what the X1 armours really are.
  5. Dagar

    UFO Roofs Indestructable?

    Okay, so I am going to ask the really important question here: can we also jump UP levels now? Like with the Parkour perk or some exoskeleton tech?
  6. Saying that again, but while we're at it, please let us replay the alien turn or give us some other info like last seen position of actor X.
  7. I am so far disengaged with my first days of Xenonauts and with the Vanilla game that I can't tell personally, but if you watch some first let's Plays, you'll see people be overwhelmed by the system, because all they know is flying straight at the enemy and getting shot down. The game does not do a good job of explaining anything, really, and the fact that you should pause as often as you can, use manual waypoints, manage your evasive rolls with keys that are not explained and that the speed has influence on your turn rate and that you should attack from the side to land missiles against evasive targets, all that is stuff you have to explore to really be successful. try working without all that and you'll likely find the air game frustrating. Can you point me towards people who do not want to have a fun game or who want the game to play itself, please? Because if I read someone wanting that I must have forgotten that by now. The thing is that what is fun to you and what is easy to you does not have to be the same for everyone else. I am obviously talking solely about the air game, not the strategy (world map) part. Maybe I worded that one a bit misleadingly. Obviously you still need to keep up with research on aircraft and their equipment to make it through the game, but not to be good at the manual part of it. The problem with X1s air game is that it arguably is the least important of the three parts of the game, the least "core" part, and the most special with its pausable real time system that needs quick reactions, while at the same time being, along with the other two parts, a component you have to succeed in in order to win, makes it frustrating for some players who already voiced their concerns. I am not one being frustrated with the air game, but I still would like to see a turn-based system instead, because I feel it would fit better into the game's overall mechanisms. That said, I have no idea how to make a good turn-based air game of two widely different opponents, as I also have said multiple times now.
  8. That's not what @Charon wrote. He meant that the air game should start simple and easy to be manageable by all skill levels and then increase in difficulty gradually. As for the difficulty increase losing campaigns: I could envision that stays simple enough so you can finish a campaign pretty much regardless of what you do. You'd lose some engagements, but some are pretty much guaranteed to win, furthering the narrative and your progress. But there would be optional goals to fulfil there to increase difficulty and/or risk as well as rewards. Speaking of the old X1 system, how about not focusing too much damage on one side of the UFO so components do not get destroyed in-air? Or how about you if could try to concentrate fire only on some areas or use weaker weaponry in order to spare more crew who you then have the chance to capture? Or how about while developing new weaponry you could field some prototype that may speed up your development of the weapon, but be worse/less reliable than what you have right now? With pilots being characters more like ground troops, even experience and achievements could be a thing to bring in there.
  9. I don't agree that the old system is a no-go, though I'd like to see a tactical turn-based one or something like FTL as well. As for your suggestion, @Emily_F: much of that idea leaves something to desire. Now I am no expert in that matter, but afaik real air combat is very, very different to real ground combat. No jet fighter is nimble enough to take cover behind anything on the ground. The engagement distances are rarely below 1km, there usually is no dogfight with MGs like with the piston engine planes of WW1 or 2. Combat relies heavily on long range target seeking missiles and counter measures. If there is a close range engagement, it is highly three dimensional and based on split second decisions and reflexes, nothing that is easily portrayed in a 2D abstraction. The height and velocity dynamics of fighter aircraft are pretty unintuitive to pretty much most of us. I don't know how, with that real world basis, you would make a fun, easy to learn and not totally outlandish "mini" game, and apparently, neither do Goldhawk (or Firaxis, for that matter).
  10. @Emily_F I would like that, too, but I put that hope more on easy to use mod tools and the community now. Which is fine to me. If Goldhawk can give me a solid basis for mods, that is all I really need from them.
  11. @Chris I agree, but at the same point, you could at least store the over-TU-threshold movement for each soldier and have a button that just executes these move orders for single soldiers or everyone in the (new) turn. That would go in the same direction QoL wise and not be hard to implement.
  12. Sure. I get the impression though that Goldhawk do not want to introduce pilots as a separate entity from planes. I'd like to see that, but at the same time, I don't mind too much, that sounds like a very easily implementable concept as a mod (given that GH want to make X2 as moddable as possible).
  13. Have yet to play the beta (though I bought it). But that is also what is my experience with pistols in X1 (X-Division), so how does that compare to X1 in your opinion? To me, it never makes sense to send a soldier with just a pistol. The reflex bonus is too low to risk it, and you don't get more TUs or Reflexes when carrying less than 100% of capacity (which, btw., is something I'd love to see, because then light builds could actually be good). Instead I'd naturally give them shields or longer range/harder hitting weapons like rifles or LMGs.
  14. I got my gog key a couple of hours ago via mail. unlocking in gog was successful, but as I am at work, I did not test downloading and running it, obviously.
  15. Dagar

    saving the game vers 1.00.01 to vers 1.00.10?

    In general it should work, if you are early enough in the game, but you will have to unlock some research manually (e.g. Wolf and Direwolf armour), once you have met the conditions. That is not exactly straight for2ward, but if you want to go this route, I can post the how-to in the next couple of days here. Maybe @Charon can help you more, but he is more or less retired from X-Div now.