winterwolves Posted June 7, 2014 Share Posted June 7, 2014 Have a look at this: The soviet union has just been hammered, which is fair enough, I did decide to cover australasia with my third base. Still, it seems pretty harsh to be able to have this much of a change from one wave. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Smith Posted June 7, 2014 Share Posted June 7, 2014 (edited) Yeah, it is, and I don't really see the point to it. O_o Why should you lose so much if you don't take down 1 wave; shouldn't it be losing several consecutive or something? Edited June 7, 2014 by John Smith Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KevinHann Posted June 7, 2014 Share Posted June 7, 2014 How could you let that many events happen with that kind of coverage?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irishguy117 Posted June 7, 2014 Share Posted June 7, 2014 First thought that occurs to me is that a hard cap would ruin the downsides of failing a terror mission. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
legit1337 Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 I've been saying this for the past three weeks. Funding hits are ridiculous. You can lose a third or more of a country's funding in a single wave. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catfur Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 How could you let that many events happen with that kind of coverage?! All the fighters are down, out of fuel, re-arming? Really, the Xenonauts ground crews need to take lessons from WWII carrier crews, hours and hours to refuel, rearm is brutal. I've been saying this for the past three weeks. Funding hits are ridiculous. You can lose a third or more of a country's funding in a single wave. I lost USSR in one wave (and my base is in USSR), aerial terror attack, in far Siberia, and nothing had range (had two Corsairs one Foxtrot available, but no range). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ntalas Posted June 9, 2014 Share Posted June 9, 2014 It's good that I see more and more people experiencing the same issues as myself (playing on 1.03). It means that I am not the crappy player and also that the game will change to the better. :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Posted June 9, 2014 Share Posted June 9, 2014 Veteran isn't going to get significantly easier on the funding side of things. Normal and Easy will though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dpelectric Posted June 9, 2014 Share Posted June 9, 2014 Veteran isn't going to get significantly easier on the funding side of things. Normal and Easy will though. Good. Veteran and insane should be exactly that, veteran and insane. But normal and easy need to appeal to newer players, and you don't want them being crushed on their first playthrough Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.